Thursday, June 6, 2019
Social Stratification Case Essay Example for Free
 Social  stratification Case Essay* Refers to the ranking individuals and groups in any given society * Tends to be familial from one generation to another* Is the hierarchical arrangement and establishment of social categories that may evolve into social groups as well as of statuses and their corresponding roles* whitethorn be viewed as a social structure, as a social process, or as a social problemBasic Concepts of Inequality1. Attributions  attributions  present a very vital role in social stratification. It assigns to  concourse different attributes as a result of differences 2.     Stereotype  one assumes that persons who fall into a particular category on the basis of certain characteristics also  postulate many characteristics that we assume to belong to that category 3. Self-fulfilling prophecies  once we categorize people  finished assigning a stereotype, our perception of their behavior if filtered through that stereotype 4. Self comparison  social scientist find that peop   le need to compare themselves with others in  direct to establish for themselves what kind of people they are. 5. A fair world  related to the key of comparison in social life are beliefs about  legal expert or the fair distribution of rewards. 6. Just world hypothesis  according to this, people like to believe that there is justice, that people get what they deserve.Social  stratification System* Differentiation refers to how things or people can be distinguished from one another. * Stratification refers to the ranking of things or people or objects.Dimensions of Stratification1. wealth and income  the income of any family depends on what its members earn and what they own. 2. Inequalities of power  sociologists define power as the ability to control ones life (personal power) and to control or  catch the actions of others (social power). 3. Inequalities of prestige  prestige of individuals and groups may be defined as the social recognition that a person or group receives from oth   ers.The Theories of Social Stratification* The  impinge theory  maintains that the result of the struggle among people for scarce rewards and that it persists in society because the haves are determined and equipped to preserve their advantage by dominating and exploiting the have nots. * Conflict theorists consider stratification unjust and unnecessary.Karl Marx  believe that all history has been the story of  track conflict over material privilege and power.4 ship canal of distributing wealth1. To each according to need  the basic needs of all the people are satisfied. 2. To each according to want  wealth is distributed according to what people desire and respect. 3. To each according to what is earned  people who live according to this system become themselves the source of their own wealth. 4. To each according to what can be taken  by  utilize whatever means.* The functionalist theory  Kingsley Davis elaborated the idea that stratification serves an important function in societ   y. He was joined by Wilbert Moore. equivalence of the two theoriesThe Functionalist View The Conflict View* Stratification is  commonplace, necessary, and inevitable * Stratification facilitates the optimal functioning of society and the individual * Stratification is an expression of commonly  shared out values * Task and reward are equitably allocated * Stratification system generally change through evolutionary processes * Stratification may be universal without being necessary and inevitable * Stratification impedes the optimal functioning of society and the individual * Stratification is an expression of the values of powerful groups * Tasks and rewards are inequitably allocated * Stratification system often change through revolutionary processesOpen and Closed System* Open system  this is also known as a class system. It has a few impediments to social mobility. There is a difference between equality of opportunity and equality of results. * Closed system  this is also known a   s caste system. In the caste system, ascribed characteristics determine social position, and individuals opportunities are limited accordingly. * Estate system  it is a closed system stratification in which a persons social position is based on ownership of land, birth, military strength.Not included. (pampam lang)Methods of Determining Class Division1. The subjective method  researchers using this method simply ask a random sample population to name the class they belong to. 2. The reputational method  the researchers select a small townspeople and ask a number of residents to assist them in their study. 3. The objective method  the researchers divide people into social classes according to their income, occupation, education, and type of residence.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.